Bruhathkayosaurus. (Pencil Drawing touchups in photoshop)

Although it's described as a theropod according to various DML messages the description is poor and it is suspected by some to be a sauropod, if so probably a titanosaur. [link]

This image is highly speculative and asumes that it is a titanosaur.

It's proportionally based on leg bone measurements. The tibia is apparently 2m.

Other (unknown) leg proportions are based on other Titanosaur reconstructions and measurments suggested by palaeontologists at the Dinosaur Mailing Lists (~3m Femur, ~2.34m Humerus.)

The neck and tail lengths are completely speculative. (If Rapetosaurus and Saltsaurus are anything to go by it would have a shorter neck. These things vary a lot between species) Skull is also speculative.

Please note, this image is not ment to be taken too seriously this animal has been poorly described and is very fragmentry. This image is just to give and vague idea of size.

Some DML posts on this creature:

[link]

[link]

I may change this some time as I have recently seen reconstructions for Saltasaurus and Rapetosaurus and both have a really short necks. The tail of saltasaurus is much longer then what I have drawn here, yet Rapetosaurs has a really short tail. So.........I'll probably leave that.

I have since come across Pauls skeletal of Argentinosaurus. If it is asumed that Bruhathkayosaurus had proportions similar to Argentinosaurus the torso would be about a meter longer.

I've seen skulls of a couple of titanosaurs (many incomplete) and they seem to have skulls slightly more diplodicus like, so I may change that.
That said, Malawisaurus seems to have a very boxy Camarasaurus-like skull.

Update: 2/8/09: I have changed the angle of the neck and tweaked some other things.